<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math</link>
  <description>Mathematical discussions and pursuits.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Palestinians Under Attack</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c2bfbea9504b9f12/1e04742bd2db9eb4?show_docid=1e04742bd2db9eb4</link>
  <description>
  Palestinians Under Attack &lt;br&gt; تعرض الشعب الفلسطيني في غزه لظلم رهيب على ايدي القوات الاسرائيليه &lt;br&gt; Palestinians are exposed for horrible unfairness at the hands of &lt;br&gt; Israeli forces. &lt;br&gt; حصار دام لشهور .. انقطاع للكهرباء دام لشهور..
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c2bfbea9504b9f12</guid>
  <author>
  smam...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:55:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Study: Black Holes Seem to Form Before Galaxies</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/03c92f68ff48adbf/7b714b66f600570a?show_docid=7b714b66f600570a</link>
  <description>
  Study: Black Holes Seem to Form Before Galaxies &lt;br&gt; January 7, 2009 from the A.P. &lt;br&gt; WASHINGTON (AP) -- When galaxies initially formed, &lt;br&gt; they weren&#39;t the first in the cosmic neighborhood. The &lt;br&gt; supermassive black holes, which reside at the center &lt;br&gt; of galaxies, probably moved in first, a new astronomy &lt;br&gt; study suggests.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/03c92f68ff48adbf</guid>
  <author>
  s...@sdrodrian.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:01:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Extending a function from the boundary of an open set</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/e65982313704b4e2/c4622b36c0433015?show_docid=c4622b36c0433015</link>
  <description>
  see &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://camoo.freeshell.org/quest1.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Laura &lt;br&gt; If you like reading the source better it is below: &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m reading Lars Hormander&#39;s book on multivariable complex &lt;br&gt; analysis and I&#39;m puzzled by something. &lt;br&gt; In Theorem 2.3.2&#39; the suppositions are: &lt;br&gt; Let $\Omega$ be a bounded open set in $\mathbf C^n$, $n&amp;gt;1$, such that the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/e65982313704b4e2</guid>
  <author>
  p...@grex.org
  (Graven Water)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:33:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>first euler&#39;s identity</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c7794d0f3840b000/c4355e520cf4d66c?show_docid=c4355e520cf4d66c</link>
  <description>
  hi, &lt;br&gt; could anybody help me to prove the first euler&#39;s identity? &lt;br&gt; the equation is: &lt;br&gt; (1+x)(1+x^3)(1+x^5).... = sum(from k=1 to infinity) ( ( x^ &lt;br&gt; ( k^2 ) ) ) / ( (1-x^2)(1-x^4)(1-x^6)... ) &lt;br&gt; the second equation is similar: &lt;br&gt; (1+x^2)(1+x^4)(1+x^6).... = sum(from k=1 to infinity) ( ( x^( k(k &lt;br&gt; +1) ) ) ) / ( (1-x^2)(1-x^4)(1-x^6)... )
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c7794d0f3840b000</guid>
  <author>
  lukaszgoo...@o2.pl
  (lg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:24:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Some formulas of varieties</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/812f4ee7e15f4193/81c4abf6220d0cb1?show_docid=81c4abf6220d0cb1</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; let R be a commutative ring with unit and I, J two ideals in R. I &lt;br&gt; think that I have figured out that the relation &lt;br&gt; V(I*J)=V(I/\J)=V(I) \/ V(J) &lt;br&gt; holds. Is this really true? I mean, the Chinese remainder theorem says &lt;br&gt; that I*J=I/\J if I+J=R and with the above relation one gets in any &lt;br&gt; case rad(I*J)=rad(I/\J) if R is a polynomial ring over an
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/812f4ee7e15f4193</guid>
  <author>
  sanchopanch...@web.de
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:24:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Does x^2+y^2=z^50 have integer solutions?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7685f013adfc025d/dca0989382524235?show_docid=dca0989382524235</link>
  <description>
  Does x^2+y^2=z^50 have integer solutions &amp;gt;0?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7685f013adfc025d</guid>
  <author>
  alvarez.torr...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:49:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Aether Displacement</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/79d2f4e2696d127e/a0132fd56488bfee?show_docid=a0132fd56488bfee</link>
  <description>
  Amazing discussion, yet Bell&#39;s Theorem? Add a dimension and you are &lt;br&gt; knocking on your own door and let yourself in - and not just now. &lt;br&gt; Really upper dimensional stuff might be bizzare, to say the least, and &lt;br&gt; would need a lot more energy to manifest itself. &lt;br&gt; Thin, silly beings attempted to abduct a farmer by lifting him up into
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/79d2f4e2696d127e</guid>
  <author>
  dolomi...@hotmail.com
  (foolsrushin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:11:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Stuck on modal logic proof</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a3af0aa5d5dce08/bab0c748377a26ba?show_docid=bab0c748377a26ba</link>
  <description>
  Hi all &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m currently reading &amp;quot;Vicious Circles&amp;quot; by Barwise and Moss, and am &lt;br&gt; stuck on a proof in Chapter 11, on modal logic. This is the first &lt;br&gt; thing I&#39;ve read about modal logic, so I apologise if my question &lt;br&gt; appears stupid. I&#39;ll also give a bit of background since I have no &lt;br&gt; idea how standard the authors&#39; definitions and notations are: the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a3af0aa5d5dce08</guid>
  <author>
  sg...@hotmail.co.uk
  (Rotwang)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:51:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Multi input Weiner Filter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/007ca3873d83d3f5/63442465622e767f?show_docid=63442465622e767f</link>
  <description>
  For the standard SISO Wiener filter we minimize the cost J &lt;br&gt; J=E[e^2]=E(d-W&#39;X)^2 &lt;br&gt; where W is a vector of weights and X is a vector of regressers. (d is &lt;br&gt; desired output) Also &#39; denotes transpose. &lt;br&gt; We do this by diferentiating wrt the weight vector W and arrive at the &lt;br&gt; standard Wiener solution. &lt;br&gt; However, in the case where W is asymmetric Matrix and d is a vector
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/007ca3873d83d3f5</guid>
  <author>
  gyansor...@gmail.com
  (HardySpicer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:21:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Symposium “Image Processing and Visualization in Solid Mechanics Processes” within the ESMC2009 Conference – Announce &amp; Call for Papers</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/46454c4d06c48121/795a6073006853b5?show_docid=795a6073006853b5</link>
  <description>
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------- &lt;br&gt; (Apologies for cross-posting) &lt;br&gt; Symposium on “Visualization and Human-Computer” &lt;br&gt; 7th EUROMECH Solid Mechanics Conference (ESMC2009) &lt;br&gt; Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, PORTUGAL, September 7-11, 2009
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/46454c4d06c48121</guid>
  <author>
  tava...@fe.up.pt
  (tavares@fe.up.pt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:24:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Probability &amp; combination question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/fd8b3d38eb10c68e/bab7fe401c24b119?show_docid=bab7fe401c24b119</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m having trouble knowing which methods I should be using to solve &lt;br&gt; this question: &lt;br&gt; (assume any other factors have no bearing on these simple &lt;br&gt; probabilities) &lt;br&gt; From the whole population if we found the probability of someone &lt;br&gt; having blonde hair = 0.2 &amp;amp; P(not blonde) = 0.8 &lt;br&gt; If I pick a random group of 10 people, how to I work out the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/fd8b3d38eb10c68e</guid>
  <author>
  petertwoca...@googlemail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:13:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>how to calculate e^ix ?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7aac204caa53b8e5/3dec5d76556c87f6?show_docid=3dec5d76556c87f6</link>
  <description>
  Write sum of the terms in e^ix form as you like &lt;br&gt; for example I&#39;m writing like this &lt;br&gt; (e^ix+e^i35x+e^-4x) x (e^i22x-e^i4x+e^i5x) x....( )..x..... &lt;br&gt; by multiplying by first 2 terms we will get 6 terms &lt;br&gt; if number of terms are more we will get more and more terms. &lt;br&gt; how to calculate them easily. &lt;br&gt; cos c + cos d &amp;amp;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7aac204caa53b8e5</guid>
  <author>
  azeez...@gmail.com
  (Nimo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:46:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Sale Nike Adidas Gucci Puma D&amp;G Bape A&amp;F NFL Watch (world famous brand)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/491c8b02d77b67ce/fa4f98360936ef2f?show_docid=fa4f98360936ef2f</link>
  <description>
  hi &lt;br&gt; We are supplier in china Footwear Apparel Handbags Jeans&amp;amp;Pants Cap &lt;br&gt; Accessory(world famous brand) &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.cicigogo.cn&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; 1) Top quality, reasonable price, safe shipping, and best service &lt;br&gt; 2) Sport shoes for men, women and kids with all sizes available &lt;br&gt; 3) Sport shoes with different colors and styles available in stock
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/491c8b02d77b67ce</guid>
  <author>
  cicitrade10...@yahoo.cn
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:37:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>compact sets</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/5aee97c8260c74bc/195d825f8d487e5e?show_docid=195d825f8d487e5e</link>
  <description>
  Hello. What is a compact set? What is an intuitive explanation of &lt;br&gt; compact set? I cant understand the below definition: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;An open cover for a set S, inside a topological space T, is a &lt;br&gt; collection of open sets whose union contains S. A finite subcover is &lt;br&gt; any finite subcollection of these open sets whose union also contains
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/5aee97c8260c74bc</guid>
  <author>
  oer...@yahoo.com
  (oercim)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:12:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Perpendicular bisector question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/0740a2536a7d2851/749b1d1c8533b7e5?show_docid=749b1d1c8533b7e5</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m having problems with my linear algebra again. Here&#39;s the question: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Find the equation of the perpendicular bisector of the line joining &lt;br&gt; the points (a,b) and (2a,-3b)&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; The answer in the book is 8by - 2ax + 8b^2 + 3a^2 = 0. &lt;br&gt; My progress on it: &lt;br&gt; The perpendicular bisector must go through the mid point of the line
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com./group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/0740a2536a7d2851</guid>
  <author>
  newbar...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:37:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
